AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100: Spec Comparison
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Links on this page are affiliate links.
You are looking at the amd 100 506008 radeon pro wx vs radeon pro wx 4100 graphics card comparison. Both cards share the same Radeon Pro WX 4100 GPU, 4 GB GDDR5 memory, and 128-bit bus. They are low-profile workstation cards. The main difference is their physical dimensions. One model is shorter but taller, while the other is longer but slimmer. This affects which small form factor PC case will accept each card.
Key differences
| Aspect | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low-Profile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Low Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Model Number | 100-506008 | Z0B15AT |
| Length | 9.75 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Height | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Width | 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| Weight | 7.83 ounces | 6.4 ounces |
| Boost Clock | 1.20 GHz | not listed |
Which one should you choose?
Choose AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low-Profile if
- You need a card that fits in a case with limited length clearance but more height space.
- You want the listed boost clock specification for reference.
Choose AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Low Profile if
- You have a very tight length constraint inside your workstation chassis.
- You prefer a lighter card for easier handling.
Verdict: Choose the first card if your case allows for a longer expansion slot but has height restrictions. Pick the second card if length is your primary constraint and you need a shorter profile. Both offer identical core performance for workstation tasks.
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Specs Compared
GPU clock speeds
The AMD 100-506008 Radeon Pro WX 4100 lists a core clock of 1.13 GHz and a boost clock of 1.20 GHz. The Z0B15AT model does not publish these specific frequency values in the provided data. Both cards use the same Radeon Pro WX 4100 graphics processor. If you need precise clock speed details for performance tuning, the 100-506008 provides explicit numbers. The Z0B15AT relies on the shared GPU architecture. This makes the 100-506008 slightly clearer for technical comparisons. You get more specific timing data with the first option.
Memory specifications
Both graphics cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit memory bus width. The AMD 100-506008 and the Z0B15AT share identical memory capacity and type. This means you can expect similar performance when loading textures or handling large datasets in workstation applications. The 128-bit interface ensures consistent bandwidth for both models. Since the memory specs are exactly the same, there is no practical difference in this category. You will not gain an advantage in memory throughput by choosing one over the other. This is a complete tie for your workflow needs.
Physical dimensions
The AMD 100-506008 measures 9.75 inches in length, 6.5 inches in width, and 2.5 inches in height. The Z0B15AT is shorter at 6.6 inches in length, but slightly wider at 8 inches and taller at 2.7 inches. Both are low-profile cards, but their shapes differ significantly. The 100-506008 is longer but narrower, while the Z0B15AT is compact in length but bulkier in width and height. You should check your chassis clearance carefully. The Z0B15AT may fit better in tight width constraints, while the 100-506008 requires more rear clearance. Neither is strictly better without knowing your case layout.
Weight
The AMD 100-506008 weighs 7.83 ounces. The Z0B15AT weighs 6.4 ounces. The Z0B15AT is lighter by 1.43 ounces. This difference is minor for a low-profile workstation card. Both cards are designed to sit in PCIe slots without heavy support brackets. The lighter Z0B15AT might reduce stress on the motherboard slightly. However, the 100-506008 is still well within standard limits. You do not need to worry about sagging or instability with either card. The weight difference does not impact performance or installation safety in any meaningful way for typical desktop setups.
Connectivity features
The AMD 100-506008 explicitly lists four Mini DisplayPort outputs. The Z0B15AT data does not specify the exact port types or quantities. Both cards support up to four displays according to general product descriptions. However, only the 100-506008 confirms the Mini DisplayPort interface in the specs. If you rely on Mini DisplayPort monitors, the 100-506008 is the safer choice. You get confirmed connectivity details with this model. The Z0B15AT might use different ports, but that is not stated. For guaranteed compatibility with Mini DisplayPort displays, the 100-506008 offers clear advantages.
Which WX 4100 model fits you
You need explicit clock speed data
The 100-506008 model lists a 1.13 GHz core clock and 1.20 GHz boost clock. This specific frequency data helps you verify performance expectations. The other model omits these values. If you rely on published clock speeds to gauge processing power, this specification provides a clear baseline for your workstation tasks.
You prefer lower weight and power
The Z0B15AT model weighs 6.4 ounces, which is lighter than the 100-506008 version. It also highlights a maximum power consumption of 50W. This efficiency is useful for compact builds. You get dynamic power optimization via AMD PowerTune. The reduced weight and documented power limits make this a practical choice for sensitive setups.
You want detailed display support info
This model explicitly states it drives a single 5K display at 60 Hz or four 4K monitors. The 100-506008 lists four Mini DisplayPort connectors but lacks this resolution detail. If you plan to run high-resolution workstations, this explicit display capability information helps you confirm compatibility with your specific monitor setup.
The products compared
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low-Profile
Best for: compact workstation builds requiring low-profile form factor
- Graphics Processor
- Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Memory Size
- 4GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Boost Clock
- 1.20 GHz
- Memory Bus Width
- 128-bit
- PCIe Interface
- PCI Express 3.0
View on Amazon: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low-Profile Affiliate link
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card with 4GB of GDDR5 memory. It features a 128-bit bus width and runs at a 1.20 GHz boost clock. This single-slot, low-profile card fits in compact systems. It supports DirectX 12 and OpenCL 2.0. You should use this card if you need reliable performance for professional workstation tasks in a small form factor.
Pros
- 4GB GDDR5 memory capacity
- Low-profile, single-slot design
- 1.20 GHz boost clock speed
- Supports DirectX 12 and Vulkan 1.0
Cons
- Only 4GB of memory limits complex rendering
- 128-bit memory bus restricts data throughput
- No active cooling fan mentioned in specs
Good fit if
- You need a low-profile card for a small workstation
- You require DirectX 12 support for professional applications
- You are running single-slot compatible hardware
Skip if
- You need more than 4GB of video memory
- You require a high-bandwidth memory bus
- You are building a high-end gaming PC
Verdict: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB is a specialized card for compact workstations. It suits professionals who need low-profile compatibility and basic professional graphics features.
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Low Profile
Best for: compact workstations needing multi-monitor support
- Graphics Processor
- Radeon Pro WX 4100
- Memory Size
- 4 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus Width
- 128-bit
- Form Factor
- Low Profile
- Dimensions
- 6.6 × 8 × 2.7 inches
View on Amazon: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Low Profile Affiliate link
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a low-profile workstation graphics card designed for professional environments. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit interface. This card supports up to four 4K displays or a single 5K screen. With a maximum power consumption of 50W, it fits into smaller cases. You should choose this card if you need reliable multi-monitor support for productivity tasks without requiring high-end gaming performance.
Pros
- Supports up to four 4K displays or one 5K display
- Low-profile form factor fits small form factor PCs
- 4 GB GDDR5 memory with 128-bit interface
- Low 50W power consumption
Cons
- Only 4 GB of memory limits heavy 3D workloads
- 128-bit memory bus restricts bandwidth compared to higher-end cards
- Single-slot design may limit fan noise dissipation
Good fit if
- You need a low-profile card for a small workstation
- You require multiple 4K displays for productivity
- You want a low-power solution for office tasks
Skip if
- You need more than 4 GB of VRAM for 3D rendering
- You want to play modern high-end games
- You require a dual-slot card for better cooling
Verdict: The AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low Profile is a practical choice for users who need a compact, low-power graphics solution for multi-monitor office setups. It suits professionals who prioritize form factor and display count over raw computational power.
Specifications side by side
| Spec | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB Low-Profile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 Low Profile |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics Processor | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
| Memory Size | 4GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Boost Clock | 1.20 GHz | not stated |
| Memory Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| PCIe Interface | PCI Express 3.0 | not stated |
| Slot Width | Single Slot | not stated |
| Memory | not stated | 4GB |
| Form Factor | not stated | Low Profile |
| Use | Workstation | not stated |
| Dimensions | 9.75 × 6.5 × 2.5 inches | 6.6 × 8 × 2.7 inches |
| Weight | 7.83 ounces | 6.4 ounces |
| Model | 100-506008 | Z0B15AT |
Frequently asked questions
Do both WX 4100 models support low-profile cases?
Yes, both cards are designed for compact workstations. The 100-506008 model measures 2.5 inches in height. The Z0B15AT model measures 2.7 inches in height. Both dimensions fit standard low-profile chassis. You can install either card in small form factor builds without clearance issues.
Which model has the longer physical length?
The 100-506008 model is longer. It measures 9.75 inches in length. The Z0B15AT model measures 6.6 inches in length. The difference is 3.15 inches. You should check your case depth before choosing the 100-506008 variant to ensure it fits.
Is there a weight difference between the two cards?
Yes, the 100-506008 is heavier. It weighs 7.83 ounces. The Z0B15AT weighs 6.4 ounces. The difference is 1.43 ounces. Both weights are light for workstation cards. The weight difference is unlikely to affect PCIe slot stability in most systems.
Do these cards share the same memory specifications?
Yes, both models use identical memory configurations. Each card contains 4 GB of GDDR5 memory. They also share a 128-bit memory bus. This consistency means memory bandwidth and capacity remain the same regardless of which physical variant you select.
Can I use the 100-506008 in a small office PC?
Yes, it is suitable for compact office PCs. It is a low-profile workstation card. However, it is 9.75 inches long. You must verify your case has enough horizontal space. The Z0B15AT is shorter at 6.6 inches if space is extremely limited.
Which model provides explicit clock speed data?
Only the 100-506008 model lists clock speeds. It specifies a 1.13 GHz core clock and a 1.20 GHz boost clock. The Z0B15AT model does not provide these frequency values in the available data. You should choose the 100-506008 if you need verified clock metrics.